)]}'
{
  "commit": "78055f22e910cfe26e021edca4c6af19d9b256fc",
  "tree": "6d5f9686a130848e627a2676648d19585f4bdb89",
  "parents": [
    "a2ff5bcfdce9914eda29e840d1fb96ded84a6bb3",
    "0f11708d9c72273b2a16fa4e9864150b05b39431"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "bors[bot]",
    "email": "26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com",
    "time": "Mon Dec 28 22:07:23 2020 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Mon Dec 28 22:07:23 2020 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Merge #266\n\n266: Make size-diff pass if building master fails. r\u003dhudson-ayers a\u003djrvanwhy\n\nsize-diff has been painful in 2 cases:\r\n\r\n1. If master is broken, it fails on PRs that fix master\u0027s build.\r\n2. If the commands required to build the examples change, it breaks. This happened when we changed rust-toolchain to the TOML format, and removed the `rustup target add` commands from the size-diff workflow. This change was fine once it hit master but broke in the PR.\r\n\r\nsize-diff still fails if the PR\u0027s build fails, so we can still detect PRs that break size-diff\u0027s functionality.\n\nCo-authored-by: Johnathan Van Why \u003cjrvanwhy@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}
