)]}'
{
  "commit": "53f0da7dc60ca181b6ea4355403962e9efbf36b9",
  "tree": "95a4fc5849c8d43316942abb184dda381411a765",
  "parents": [
    "974b17c59550c888f4e4d35344465cf60a2a6a3a",
    "d1ec41e2a7599a1a4cb60ba172e69574511a544d"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "bors[bot]",
    "email": "26634292+bors[bot]@users.noreply.github.com",
    "time": "Thu Jul 02 23:51:02 2020 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "GitHub",
    "email": "noreply@github.com",
    "time": "Thu Jul 02 23:51:02 2020 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Merge #212\n\n212: \u0027copy_from_slice\u0027 instead of \u0027clone_from_slice\u0027 when copying \u0027u8\u0027 slices r\u003dJOE1994 a\u003dJOE1994\n\nHello :crab: ,\r\nthis PR changes invocations of `clone_from_slice()` to `copy_from_slice()`.\r\n`copy_from_slice()` performs memcpy, while `clone_from_slice()` performs an element-wise copy.\r\n(`copy_from_slice()` should generally run faster than `clone_from_slice()`)\r\n\r\nThe affected call sites all copy `u8` slices, and since `u8` implements `Copy`, it is safe to use `copy_from_slice()`.\r\n\r\nThank you for reviewing this PR :superhero_woman: :superhero_man: :superhero: \n\nCo-authored-by: JOE1994 \u003cjoseph942010@gmail.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}