)]}'
{
  "commit": "281a7b2f99f4ef689684b687dc3e884fe1e744d4",
  "tree": "fe98c2a12d8fe4f0eec18d4382542fb1fbd8da75",
  "parents": [
    "8f659ab3a2cca94e5db5a211da6b1528bacb9bc8"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Timothy",
    "email": "timothytim@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 18 14:37:31 2019 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "tjaychen",
    "email": "timothytim@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 18 16:38:16 2019 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Add 1 to the reqfifo depth\n\nIn the best case, sram can complete a transaction immediately on the next cycle.\nWhen this happens, the adapter should immediately accept the next transaction.\nHowever, if the reqfifo is sized to the same depth as the outstanding capacity,\nit is not able to do so without creating a response -\u003e request timing path.\n\nAs a result, an extra entry is added to the request fifo to handle this case.\n\nThe response fifo is not sized up as it can work as a passthrough fifo and\nwill not back-pressure on back to back responses unless the host is unwilling\nto accept a response.\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "3a1b281930f7f510dade9511468606fddabb75b7",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "hw/ip/tlul/rtl/tlul_adapter_sram.sv",
      "new_id": "3004a0551ed1df76463bdc9b3b429f3f7256c78d",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "hw/ip/tlul/rtl/tlul_adapter_sram.sv"
    }
  ]
}
